Money line betting market efficiency kuper

One single line will be used for the picks. Dare found that the eleven-for-ten betting rule for sides and totals resulting in a minimum of Dare sets to find a new hurdle rate for inefficiency. He mentions the fact that betting strategies cannot be diversified and needs much greater required return than the risk-free rate.

Hurdle rates will vary using the money line, depending on the payout. Different lines have different payout ratios, which will need different hurdle rates to deem inefficiency. Aadland and Wever build on previous research and expose a new market inefficiency. A differential strategy of betting on home and visitor underdogs with large closing lines can produce significant profitable returns.

Evidence shown from this study suggest that the recent NFL betting market has underpriced large underdogs while bettors have failed to recognize the amount of parity in the NFL. The inefficiency is consistent with a certain amount of herd behavior toward highly publicized elite teams. Underdogs yield significant returns from a low-risk, high-reward scenario. For the most part, bottom strength teams can play with the medium strength teams and medium strength teams can keep up with the top teams.

The closer the spread is, the closer the game should be. Results show that the home field bias is disappearing, but the bias towards favorites is slowly growing. Due to the level of risk associated with gambling, one must be able to adjust for risk and return, which is what the Kelly Criterion does. Money line betting will result in winning, losing the amount wagered, or the slight chances of a game ending in a tie would result in a push.

Before placing a wager, one must realize the risk they are putting on the line in proportion to how much wealth they have. This is why I have selected this criterion, as it can be used as a proportional wealth management gambling system. By using the criterion, optimal proportions of wealth to bet, 6. A majority of the NFL studies using this method use the point spread and have a constant payout ratio in the formula. For my research, the payout ratio became variable because of different money lines closing at slightly different values.

By switching the ratios, some winners from previous studies became losers, and winners pay a higher return. Every team has historical trends- from current trends to dating back to back many years before that. These trends are offered by bookmakers to provide information to bettors. This information is made available to get more customers.

If future steps or directions cannot be predicted on the basis of past actions, we can say that the outcome of any NFL game cannot be predicted of how they have done in the past. Obviously some teams are superior, but nothing is guaranteed. If all favorites 7. If everybody knew that a team was guaranteed to win a game, who would watch it?

There would be absolutely no value in the money line market. Nobody wants to see a team continuously dominate. A game can change from any random event, or a series of unexpected events. Lines will follow demand, but I expect some to prove inefficiency in the short-run underdog market. Efficient Market Hypothesis The Efficient Market Hypothesis states that no stock is a better buy than any other, a conclusion that justifies random choices.

According to classical theory, a stock price always equals the present value of expected dividends and that expected dividends are the best possible forecasts because of rational expectations. That is the balance made from the demand for the lines.

Looking for undervalued money lines are useless. Available information will represent the closing line- the movement in line impossible to predict. Even if the strategy yields a positive results for a few games, seasons, how do you know when to stop?

Bookmakers available information The gambling market is an enormous market in which bookmakers have made fortunes, bettors have won a pretty penny, or even blown there bankroll. There are numerous bookmakers out there who must compete amongst each other to keep up with such a profitable industry.

As bettors interpret the information and make picks, lines will change as demand changes. As a team becomes more favorable, a higher price will be charged to purchase that pick. As stated before, a random walk is one in which future steps or directions cannot be predicted on the basis of past actions.

There is no guarantee that a team will win a game, regardless of how they have performed previously under certain conditions. Previous trends and performance can lead to the belief that a team will win, but that is not a guarantee. Some people claim to be experts, or purchase expert picks, but how can somebody claim to be an expert at something that has an uncertain outcome?

An expert would be able to find the inefficiencies in the market and make their own profit. If there is more profit made from the fees than the picks, a high fee must be charged in exchange for the picks offered. Putting the facts together All available information of previous performance from teams has been put aside to observe betting on all underdog lines.

If results show that certain closing lines have consistently beaten the market, available information would be irrelevant. The market provides information of what should happen in a game, but inefficiencies can be found at certain lines. Historical odds of closing money lines are not something offered to many bettors- and even so, why would they choose to place a wager based on previous closing line trends instead of how a team performs?

These variables will cause demand to change in a money line, which will alter the risk and reward for both sides. Data Data was collected from footballlocks. Las Vegas historical closing lines from are offered, along with services to members. The correlation between footballines and docsports was 0. Methodology Money lines of winning under dogs from NFL regular seasons were gathered, allocated by point spread, and averaged out. A sample size of 2, games was observed to find if certain lines have proved inefficiency in the underdog market.

A ten dollar base rate was used to represent each wager. To determine inefficiency, the Kelly criterion was chosen. Any line that produced a positive optimal proportion of wealth to bet was considered efficient and proves market inefficiency. This series of formulas is a proportional strategy for the optimum money management strategy for betting. In previous studies using this system, the point spread was observed. There is a fixed payout ratio in the point spread criterion, which occurs from the that the bookmaker receives regardless of the spread.

By using the money line to analyze underdog efficiency, the payout ratio has been changed to the average closing money line of each spread. In the data, each line different line bet is considered a different strategy. Results No underdog line proved inefficiency in the long run for nine seasons observed for any of the lines. To beat the market, you would need to have perfect market timing and departure.

Eighteen lines proved efficiency over at least one season, but not in the overall model. Significant lines were difficult to locate due to the uncommon large spread of underdog wins. Only eleven lines had more than 20 observations. The eleven lines are shown in graphs below. Optimal proportion of wealth to bet must break out of the negatives to be considered an efficient betting strategy. In the second graph, notice that the same trend lines are significantly above the trend line. The first two graphs contradict the third graph.

But in the knockout stages of a World Cup, a game is typically decided by one goal -- or by a penalty shootout. The World Cup's format favors unpredictability. If this competition were a league, played over 38 games, the best team would most probably win. Over the long run, luck tends to even out. One week the referee will wrongly give your opponents a penalty; the next week, he'll give it to you.

But a World Cup is too short for luck to even out. The competition is a lot like the playoffs in U. In World Cups, the difference between going home to rotten tomatoes after the first round and making the semifinals is often a matter of a few inches here or there on a couple of shots.

Just look at how many past World Cups have turned on one or two moments. Just before full-time in the final of , with the score , a shot from Holland's winger Rob Rensenbrink bounced off Argentina's post; the Argentines went on to win in extra time. Twenty years later, in the hours before the France-Brazil final, Brazil's star Ronaldo suffered what appeared to have been a panic attack while sleeping; exhausted afterward, he wandered the field like a zombie, and France won In , Spain became world champion after scoring only eight goals in seven games.

La Roja played badly most of the time, and probably wouldn't have triumphed if a Paraguay penalty had gone in during their quarterfinal, or if Spain keeper Iker Casillas hadn't saved Arjen Robben's shot with his studs late in the final.

And in , what if Argentina's normally deadly Gonzalo Higuain had scored one-on-one against Germany's Manuel Neuer 20 minutes into the final? The greatest prize in soccer hinges on a few moments. Jonathan Wilson puts it well in his book "Anatomy of England": "One moment can shape a game, and one game can shape a tournament, and one tournament can shape a career.

Soccer is not always fair. One bad day, or a ball that hits the post and rolls out, and you're flying home with no chance to even things up next week. Or you might lose a penalty shootout. One of the rituals of World Cups is laughing at England. English soccer does have giant flaws, but the country has also been simply unlucky. Of England's 12 major tournaments since , it exited six on penalties.

All they do is study soccer around the world. He does everything on statistics," said Dyke. He says you can alter the chances of winning or losing on penalties, but not by a lot. So if the luck had gone the other way, his argument is that we'd have won one or two of those and we wouldn't be sitting here having this conversation. Then there's the occasionally outsized role of home advantage at this tournament. In international soccer generally, playing at home was worth an average of a goal a game between and according to Stefan Szymanski, economics professor at the University of Michigan and my coauthor on the book "Soccernomics".

But in some World Cups, playing at home may matter even more. I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist but there are powerful interests chiefly big sponsors and FIFA who want the host nation to stay in the tournament as long as possible so as to keep the home fans interested. Many people remember the bizarre refereeing decisions that helped host South Korea beat an excellent Italy team in the knockout rounds.

Not many people know that the Ecuadorean referee in that game, Byron Moreno, was arrested at JFK Airport in New York eight years later after a customs official found "hard objects on the defendant's stomach, back and both of his legs.

He was sentenced to 30 months in a Brooklyn jail, but was released after 26 due to good behavior. And shortly after the World Cup, Moreno was suspended for 20 matches in the Ecuadorean league for his controversial handling of a first division match.

These revelations say something important about World Cups -- something that isn't necessarily captured in the pre-tournament predictions. Next year's tournament may have its own Morenos even if we don't realize it at the time.

24 OPTIONS BINARY OPTIONS REVIEW

Bird, Ron, and Michael McCrae. Corral R, Leonardo. Dolbear Jr, F. Figlewski, Stephen. Gabriel, Paul E. Golec, Joseph, and Maurry Tamarkin. Gramm, Marshall, and Douglas H. Hausch, D. Management Science, , pp. Hausch, Donald B. Ziemba, and Mark Rubinstein. Smith, Michael A. Snyder, Wayne W. Twomey, Paul. Market efficiency of horse-race betting markets with applications to spread betting. University of Sussex, Evidence from arbitrage and trading strategies.

Williams, Leighton Vaughan. Evidence from UK betting markets. Yet United Natural Foods is a bigger business than every soccer club on the planet. Most clubs are the size of a supermarket. Not a supermarket chain, but a single supermarket. Statistical analysis bears this out. Szymanski analyzed the behavior of English and Spanish clubs from to to see whether they were pursuing profit or victory.

Profit requires limiting wages, which means fewer victories. He found that if FC Barcelona wanted to maximize its profits, it would need to aim for 15th in the league to seriously reduce its wage bill. For clubs like Athletic Bilbao, their most profitable position would be in the second league — where they could save a great deal on wages.

The clear conclusion was that if profit was the goal, then clubs were spending way more than they should. If a club gets into trouble, it can cut its wages, suffer relegation and keep on playing in a lower division. This is not normal business practice. Ford cannot, in response to poor results, sack its workforce in favor of unskilled employees producing noticeably worse cars.

Consumers would simply not put up with the inferior products. The reality is that the vast majority of managers make little difference. Most, in fact, are mediocre. For proof, look no further than the man who oversaw one of the greatest feats in English soccer.

Then, in his first season with lowly Leicester, they won a completely unexpected Premier League title. If Ranieri was mediocre for much of his career, it seems unlikely that he was the cause of success in a single season. This idea, however, seems to contradict an observable phenomenon — the bounce in performance after a new manager is appointed. When a manager is sacked, performance does tend to improve.

When Manchester City got rid of Mark Hughes in , the team won its first four games under the newly appointed Roberto Mancini. It found that an average club wins 1. If Manchester City had stuck with Mark Hughes after a particularly bad run of results in , they very likely would have seen results improve, and Hughes — not his replacement Roberto Mancini — could have taken credit for their subsequent success. What if much of this spending was a waste? But the goal was a one-off. So what should clubs do to get transfers right?

They should be guided by data, not fashion or instinct. Consider age. Clubs should buy players in their early 20s — not too young, not too old. A few brilliant teenagers — like Messi or Ronaldo — become world class players. Most, however, do not. Probably not. Players in their late 20s, on the other hand, have a proven track record, but that mainly just makes them overpriced and overrated. When measured by goals scored, the average striker peaks by 25, meaning that their early 20s represents the sweet-spot for high-value players.

If there is only a weak relationship between transfer spending and performance, how come the richest clubs usually win? While studies find no strong link between spending on transfers and performance, they find a very strong relationship between spending on wages and performance. For instance, Manchester United spent 3. At the other end of the spectrum, MK Dons spent 0. Well, high pay attracts high performers. There are exceptions, of course. What about Leicester? They won the English Premier League with the 15th-highest wage bill.

In a single season, the connection between wages and success is weaker than in the long term, as over one season luck can have a bigger influence. Leicester had a lot of luck, winning the league with a goal difference — that is, the net number of goals scored — of just 32 the average for a champion is Leicester played very well, with some standout performances, but they also benefited from all the regular title contenders suffering from poor seasons.

The following season, natural order reasserted itself. Leicester fell back and the high wage-spending clubs returned to the top of the table. The more you spend on wages, the more successful your team will be. The first attempts to collect data were made by retired British accountant Charles Reep in the s. Frustrated while watching a particularly bad match, he started scribbling notes on chances made and goals scored.

But his approach of recording play is continued to this day. Things have advanced since the days of scribbling notes during a match. Sam Allardyce, often regarded as a bit of an old-fashioned manager, was something of a pioneer in using data in English soccer.

As manager of Bolton Wanderers in the early s, he used data to guide tactics and found it led to an easy source of goals: set pieces such as corners, free-kicks and throw-ins. Data shows that players still very often shoot at goal from outside the penalty area, no doubt dreaming of glory. As data is applied more and more rigorously, we might expect these exciting, but usually fruitless attempts on goal to die out as the game evolves.

It turns out there are some significant connections between cities, politics, industry and soccer. Dictators generally invest resources in the capital as the center of power. Mielke adored Dynamo. Referees knew this, and Dynamo had a funny habit of getting penalties in the 95th minute. But after the s, the power of the fascist-backed teams from capitals began to wane. Salazar died in , and Franco in From this point onwards, the European Cup was dominated by provincial, industrial, western cities, not capitals.

Why is that? Consider Manchester. The industrial revolution changed everything, and by , the newly industrial Manchester was the sixth largest city in Europe. Most of the new locals were migrants, and, looking for something to be a part of, found soccer. Supporting the local club helped them to belong, so clubs mattered more and grew bigger.

These cities all share similar industrial histories, while upper-class towns such as Oxford, York, Cambridge or Canterbury have barely any soccer presence at all. Today, the great capitals are rising. London has Chelsea. Paris Saint-Germain is growing.

Both the ultra-rich individuals who like to buy and invest in clubs and international superstar owners tend to gravitate to these open, welcoming capitals Real Madrid, having built its strength under Franco, has always been an exception to this trend. The best provincial teams, like Barcelona and Bayern Munich — remain at or near the top of European soccer. But being a capital is no longer the weakness that it used to be.

From Didier Drogba to Diego Maradona, the origins of many soccer stars are lowly. Is there a connection between poverty off the pitch and riches on it? Iceland is a great example. This land of volcanoes, fishing and just , people became the smallest country ever to qualify for either a European or World Cup — a huge overachievement for such a tiny country.

In , Iceland started building one of the best all-weather sports infrastructures on the planet. Over schools got playing fields, and seven heated indoor facilities with full-size soccer pitches were built. This, remember, in a country with the population of a small city. Kids are not just encouraged to play, but actively taught by qualified, paid coaches. Years later, this investment paid off.

Wealth might help countries, but what about individual players? Does money help them? Not quite. Many of the best European players — from Rooney to Zidane, Ronaldo to Ibrahimovic — came from poor neighborhoods in Europe. In soccer, poor European kids are the most likely to reach this number. They live in cramped apartments, so spend time outside with friends in similar circumstances.

Часто человеку bettingen am mainstay мое почтение

Before deciding on moneyline vs spread betting, you should make sure that you know the difference between the two. Here is what you need to know about moneyline bets and point spread bets. Moneyline betting is very easy to understand. You would also need to check out the odds for a moneyline bet before making it. Spread betting is slightly more complicated than moneyline betting.

If you place a spread bet on the Packers, you would need them to either win the game outright or cover the spread by losing by less than 3. If, on the other hand, you place a spread bet on the Bears, you would need them to win by more than 3.

They only have to worry about whether or not their team wins. But as you can see, one of the downsides of moneyline betting is that those who bet on a favorite often have to lay down more money than they would have to when using spread betting. If you are unsure of how we got these numbers, we must again refer you to our guide on how to read odds. Quite simply, when debating which to use on your next bet, you should focus on three factors:.

Once you have looked at all of these factors, you will be able to make a decision on whether to go for the moneyline or the spread. The answer to this question is dependent on the line and bettor. Overall, spreads are usually definitively better in games where there is a clear favorite to win. Again, this depends on the bet.

However, as a general, moneylines overall force bettors to pay more juice in situations where there is a clear favorite. Moneylines could include overtime but also not. In sports where a draw is a possible result before an overtime period, it is important to make sure that you select the betting option that fits your desires. A bet with negative odds is more likely to happen, which is why some bettors may try to take a chance on such an outcome.

Covering the spread means that a team has beaten the predicted margin stated by sportsbooks. Either the favorite wins by more points than predicted, or the underdog loses by fewer than predicted. Moneyline vs Point Spread Betting Explained If you are at all familiar with sports betting, you will know that there is a stark difference between moneyline and point spread bets.

Some of the areas we focus on include: How moneylines work How point spreads work When to use each of these bets We also list a bunch of sportsbooks with great odds that you can explore if you feel the need to test your newfound gambling knowledge about spreads and moneylines.

Best Online Sportsbooks 1. Play Now Intertops Sport. Play Now Bovada Sportsbook. Rating: 4. Play Now Xbet Sports. Play Now Sports Betting online. Play Now BetOnline. Play Now SportBet. Play Now GT Bets. Play Now FantasyBet. Play Now WagerWeb. Play Now Betnow Sportsbook. Play Now Youwager Sportsbook. Is it better to bet spread or moneyline? What pays more moneyline or spread? Can you parlay moneyline and spread? You can parlay moneylines and spreads but not on the same game.

Does moneyline include overtime? Why would you bet on negative odds? What does cover the spread mean? We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.

1000000000 bettingsites in south africa фраза

It is indicative of the amount that must be risked to return a profit. Moneylines are simply straight-up betting lines with no spread involved, which is why they can range quite significantly. Here in this example, the Broncos have been set in the role of the favorite, going off at on the betting line. So you can certainly see the disparity on the payout and why someone might want to take the Jaguars over the Broncos. Also, taking underdog moneylines in parlay bets can be huge for your payouts!

Miami has been set in the role of the betting favorite, going off at on the betting line. On the other side of the equation, the Lakers are in the underdog role. You can see a wide range of profits for a moneyline, because the underdog and favorite can be far apart straight up with no point spread. Moneylines are one of the most popular bets that players get involved in. There are always teams that are expected to beat other teams. The margin of victory may be pretty wide. The big thing that sticks out here is how big of a favorite some teams are.

There plenty of moneylines that might show a team being a heavy favorite and if players bet against them, that is a very huge profitable opportunity. Upsets are always going to happen so this is where a lot of bread can be won. There are also toss-up games as well that many players take a stab at as well and end up cashing big on Bovada.

This is the place to get when it comes to Moneyline bets regardless if its blowouts or close games. It's clear that BetOnline is one of the best sportsbooks for players and the moneylines that are offered are one of the main reasons why. There is news coming out all the time about teams prior to games and as soon as news drop that effects a team, it also affects the Moneyline on BetOnline.

This is what gives BetOnline a bonus over other sportsbooks because of the consistent update of Moneyline and always moving. Place your bet early could also be a great idea because of the news that could swing later on that week or day before matchup. BetOnline has it set up to where if any changes need to have done that is possible.

There are a number of things that SportsBetting sportsbook offers that makes it one of the better online sportsbooks for players. When it comes to picking some of these games with favorable matchups, the Moneyline does really determine how much players want to put down on these games. When it comes to upsets, however, this is where players can have their lives change by just one pick.

Players with SportsBetting account have seen the Moneyline and have taken advantage of that the line because of the possible big payout. When you see a team like the Lions be underdogs against the Arizona Cardinals pull out the victory, only one thing is happening and that is big money is being handed out to all the players who took the chance on SportsBettting. It is hard to find any sportsbook that has better moneylines that MyBookie.

The way Moneyline works is very simple and most of the time it changes depending on what players are playing and are not. This often changes and sometimes in the favor of a player's bet. MyBookie is known for having a lot of people cash big when picking the Moneyline and the reason why is simple, their lines are better. This is why shopping for lines is so important for all players. You can like a team to win a game and have decided you want to place a wager on them but once shopping around for lines, there is a big chance that you will find that MyBookie has the best moneylines.

At Odds Shark, we primarily use American odds because the majority of betting sites use them, especially when displaying moneyline odds. The amount you bet is completely up to you but this method makes it easier to track, especially for recreational sports bettors, because bankroll management is essential for long-term success. When betting on moneylines, not every matchup will have a clear favorite or underdog. In fact, oddsmakers may think the game is so close to call that their moneyline odds will be nearly the same.

When evenly matched teams square off, it can be close to a toss-up in terms of which side will win. There is almost always an edge to be found. This can also be the case for soccer. Here is an example of moneyline odds for the lower-scoring games:. Before placing any moneyline bets, an experienced sports bettor will do extensive research into the game. Once a matchup is announced in football, basketball or any sport, sportsbooks will release betting odds for the matchup for the moneyline.

The prevailing theory in sports is that teams typically perform better at home than they do on the road. This data may not be the decisive factor when placing your moneyline bet but it certainly needs to be taken into consideration. Researching a specific matchup and how it could potentially impact the game requires a lot of experience and study but for new bettors, it could be as simple as looking at offense vs defense. In MLB, how a team fares against left-handed pitching can be crucial.

No team goes undefeated except for the Patriots and Dolphins. How else are you supposed to predict the future without knowing your history? Regardless of payout, the main goal for ANY moneyline bet is to win.

Making the correct call is the bottom line, so your choices should revolve around which side you think has the greater chance to win. In this matchup, the Bucks are the favorite. Not all underdogs are created equal.

Just like your mama said, you better shop around, especially for moneyline odds. While most of the major betting sites Odds Shark works with are typically in range, you can find slight odds differences, which is why line shopping is essential for a sports bettor. For example, a matchup between the Lakers and Celtics may see varied odds for the moneyline at two different sportsbooks:.

FREE BETTING CSGO

Dolbear Jr, F. Figlewski, Stephen. Gabriel, Paul E. Golec, Joseph, and Maurry Tamarkin. Gramm, Marshall, and Douglas H. Hausch, D. Management Science, , pp. Hausch, Donald B. Ziemba, and Mark Rubinstein. Smith, Michael A. Snyder, Wayne W. Twomey, Paul.

Market efficiency of horse-race betting markets with applications to spread betting. University of Sussex, Evidence from arbitrage and trading strategies. Williams, Leighton Vaughan. Evidence from UK betting markets. Williams, Leighton Vaughan, and David Paton.

This page will be updated in due course. Putting the fact together 8. Data 9. Methodology Results Conclusion NFL Regular Seasons results were collected and put into a modified version of the Kelly Criterion in an attempt to prove inefficiency. Prior research using the Kelly Criterion observed point spread bets, which will result in a fixed payout ratio.

Due to the money line having different payouts from the bookmaker balancing the line, the payouts for a line will be variable. I fail to refute the Efficient Market Hypothesis, and find that in nine seasons of data, the market remained efficient in the ong run. Introduction The NFL betting market is not a mirror image of the stock market, but they do share some common traits.

Sports gambling tends to be a zero-sum game, a wager is lost or won. In the stock market, you may lose some of your investment, but you are not likely to lose the entire investment. According to the EMH, stock market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all relevant information. By picking all closing lines, true value should be represented by all relevant information.

Information is offered by bookmakers to attract customers and balance lines to maximize profits. If we follow the EMH, that information offered is pointless to predict outcomes of the games. A method in which an investor may obtain higher earnings would be to pick a riskier investments- hence why underdogs were the topic of study. Literature Review Kuper concluded that the domestic NFL betting market for the closing money lines of the season are statistically inefficient.

The findings suggest that the inefficiency is such that a true profit rendering strategy can be utilized. One single line will be used for the picks. Dare found that the eleven-for-ten betting rule for sides and totals resulting in a minimum of Dare sets to find a new hurdle rate for inefficiency. He mentions the fact that betting strategies cannot be diversified and needs much greater required return than the risk-free rate.

Hurdle rates will vary using the money line, depending on the payout. Different lines have different payout ratios, which will need different hurdle rates to deem inefficiency. Aadland and Wever build on previous research and expose a new market inefficiency. A differential strategy of betting on home and visitor underdogs with large closing lines can produce significant profitable returns.

Evidence shown from this study suggest that the recent NFL betting market has underpriced large underdogs while bettors have failed to recognize the amount of parity in the NFL. The inefficiency is consistent with a certain amount of herd behavior toward highly publicized elite teams.

Underdogs yield significant returns from a low-risk, high-reward scenario. For the most part, bottom strength teams can play with the medium strength teams and medium strength teams can keep up with the top teams. The closer the spread is, the closer the game should be. Results show that the home field bias is disappearing, but the bias towards favorites is slowly growing.

Due to the level of risk associated with gambling, one must be able to adjust for risk and return, which is what the Kelly Criterion does. Money line betting will result in winning, losing the amount wagered, or the slight chances of a game ending in a tie would result in a push. Before placing a wager, one must realize the risk they are putting on the line in proportion to how much wealth they have.

This is why I have selected this criterion, as it can be used as a proportional wealth management gambling system. By using the criterion, optimal proportions of wealth to bet, 6. A majority of the NFL studies using this method use the point spread and have a constant payout ratio in the formula.

For my research, the payout ratio became variable because of different money lines closing at slightly different values. By switching the ratios, some winners from previous studies became losers, and winners pay a higher return. Every team has historical trends- from current trends to dating back to back many years before that. These trends are offered by bookmakers to provide information to bettors. This information is made available to get more customers.

If future steps or directions cannot be predicted on the basis of past actions, we can say that the outcome of any NFL game cannot be predicted of how they have done in the past. Obviously some teams are superior, but nothing is guaranteed. If all favorites 7. If everybody knew that a team was guaranteed to win a game, who would watch it? There would be absolutely no value in the money line market.

Nobody wants to see a team continuously dominate. A game can change from any random event, or a series of unexpected events. Lines will follow demand, but I expect some to prove inefficiency in the short-run underdog market.

Efficient Market Hypothesis The Efficient Market Hypothesis states that no stock is a better buy than any other, a conclusion that justifies random choices. According to classical theory, a stock price always equals the present value of expected dividends and that expected dividends are the best possible forecasts because of rational expectations. That is the balance made from the demand for the lines. Looking for undervalued money lines are useless.

Available information will represent the closing line- the movement in line impossible to predict. Even if the strategy yields a positive results for a few games, seasons, how do you know when to stop? Bookmakers available information The gambling market is an enormous market in which bookmakers have made fortunes, bettors have won a pretty penny, or even blown there bankroll.

There are numerous bookmakers out there who must compete amongst each other to keep up with such a profitable industry. As bettors interpret the information and make picks, lines will change as demand changes. As a team becomes more favorable, a higher price will be charged to purchase that pick. As stated before, a random walk is one in which future steps or directions cannot be predicted on the basis of past actions.

There is no guarantee that a team will win a game, regardless of how they have performed previously under certain conditions. Previous trends and performance can lead to the belief that a team will win, but that is not a guarantee. Some people claim to be experts, or purchase expert picks, but how can somebody claim to be an expert at something that has an uncertain outcome?

An expert would be able to find the inefficiencies in the market and make their own profit. If there is more profit made from the fees than the picks, a high fee must be charged in exchange for the picks offered. Putting the facts together All available information of previous performance from teams has been put aside to observe betting on all underdog lines. If results show that certain closing lines have consistently beaten the market, available information would be irrelevant.

The market provides information of what should happen in a game, but inefficiencies can be found at certain lines. Historical odds of closing money lines are not something offered to many bettors- and even so, why would they choose to place a wager based on previous closing line trends instead of how a team performs? These variables will cause demand to change in a money line, which will alter the risk and reward for both sides. Data Data was collected from footballlocks. Las Vegas historical closing lines from are offered, along with services to members.

The correlation between footballines and docsports was 0.